2,756
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
[[User:PirateCaptain]][[User:Aron]][[User:MagaNH6]] I added my final thoughts about our first value directly in the article under "final thoughts" (I hope this was ok - can adapt it if needed). By the way - I love "loosing" an argument, because usually this means that I learnt something 😉) | [[User:PirateCaptain]][[User:Aron]][[User:MagaNH6]] I added my final thoughts about our first value directly in the article under "final thoughts" (I hope this was ok - can adapt it if needed). By the way - I love "loosing" an argument, because usually this means that I learnt something 😉) | ||
--[[User:Anja|Anja]] ([[User talk:Anja|talk]]) 10:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) | --[[User:Anja|Anja]] ([[User talk:Anja|talk]]) 10:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Anja]] Thanks for adding your thoughts. I absolutely love loosing an argument as well for the same reason and added that point to the description of our main Discussion article here: [[Investmentwiki:Discussions]] What do you think about naming the value continuous Improvement? Do you have Arguments for or against it? | |||
While we are experimenting with detailed discussion i added started a discussion about best practices here: [[Investmentwiki_talk:Discussions]]. | |||
In terms of timeline i am thinking about leaving the discussion open for the next couple of weeks. Final thoughts and arguments from [[User:MagaNH6]][[User:Aron]] are still missing and potentially someone else might also want to join the discussion. --[[User:PirateCaptain|PirateCaptain]] ([[User talk:PirateCaptain|talk]]) 08:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) | |||