2,756
edits
Talk:Volkswagen:Sources: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have added a link to an article( describing how to judge the analyst recommendations) to the [[Guideline:Analysts]]--[[User:Aron|Aron]] ([[User talk:Aron|talk]]) 16:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | I have added a link to an article( describing how to judge the analyst recommendations) to the [[Guideline:Analysts]]--[[User:Aron|Aron]] ([[User talk:Aron|talk]]) 16:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Aron|Aron]] For how many analyst did you try to check? In the past company stocks often jumped or declined relatively drastically (5+%) after the recommendation of widely followed analysts. On the day of the recommendation there have been news articles titled something like "Twitter jumps after buy recommendation from xy") Therefore i think it should be possible finding clues how much a stock is reacting to analyst judgements based on past data. The most meaningful timeframe in most cases is just the day when the analyst recommendation was issued. Overall the tasks is low prio and not of particular importance of now and i agree that it is a good practice writing down market reactions after analyst recommendations as they come in. Nevertheless i think we should try to determine influential analyst especially for smaller companies because they move more on recommendations. One place to start and double checking on analysts could be Upwork. What do you mean with your last sentence? --[[User:PirateCaptain|PirateCaptain]] ([[User talk:PirateCaptain|talk]]) 17:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC) | |||