3,882
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
=== Conclusion: === | === Conclusion: === | ||
Some of the most prominent leading indicators used in this analysis show signs of significant deterioration | Some of the most prominent leading indicators used in this analysis show signs of significant deterioration and a high probability that the economy could enter a recession sometime after Q2/Q3 2023. Given China's reopening and the demand this will bring to the global economy, since China is the second largest economy in the world, it could slow the rate of contraction the economy is already experiencing, acting as a positive shock in the short term. | ||
Some | Some analyst oppose to this idea due to the fact that the labor market is still strong, but is important to take into account that the labor market is one of the most lagging economic indicators. While unemployment is an important recession indicator, unemployment usually peaks long after the recession has begun and can last well into recovery. That's because the NBER (and others) say a recession is over when the economic contraction hits bottom and starts to rebound, not when the recovery is complete. As an example, in 2008, the recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, according to NBER. Yet in April 2008, five months into the recession, the U.S. unemployment rate was just 5%, up only slightly from 4.7% six months earlier. Unemployment continued to rise to hit 10% by October 2009, four months after the official end of the recession and seven months after the stock market hit bottom.<ref>https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032515/why-does-unemployment-tend-rise-during-recession.asp#citation-21</ref> | ||
Is important to mention that even though leading indicators can provide a picture of the direction we can expect the economy to take in coming months, is not possible to | Is also important to mention that even though leading indicators can provide a picture of the direction we can expect the economy to take in the coming months, is not possible to derive from them the magnitude of the possible decline. At this moment, we could just consider that given that some of the numbers analyzed are in line with numbers seen in past recessions, historically it could mean that the probability of a serious contraction is higher than just a mild recession, but most importantly, given the FED narrative and actions to continue tightening while this economy contraction unfolds., which could lead them to an overtighten scenario. | ||
In addition, according to the Sahm rule<ref>https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release?rid=456#:~:text=The%20Sahm%20Rule%20identifies%20signals,time%20Sahm%20Rule%20Recession%20Indicator</ref>, the US economy will be in a recession when the unemployment rate hits 4.1%, the FED projections show an unemployment rate already of 4.6% in 2023 , a level above the rule threshold, and not in line when their narrative of a soft landing possible. The Sahm rule also shows that when the unemployment rate rises 0.5% over the course of a year, it ends up rising by around 2% or more, which means there is a probability the US economy could end up with levels of at least 6% unemployment. | |||
6% Unemployment is in line with some analyst scenarios of 6-7% following the serious decline in housing activity the economy is experiencing, and even though is still a low level | 6% Unemployment is in line with some analyst scenarios of 6-7% following the serious decline in housing activity the economy is experiencing, and even though is still a low level compared to other times in history, is the rate of change in the indicator that will determine how bad the recession will be, since the rate of change of the economy (GDP) will move according to the rate of change of the economic variables. | ||
== What does it mean for the markets? == | == What does it mean for the markets? == | ||
== References == | == References == |