Talk:Volkswagen:Deliveries/Seasonal Analysis: Difference between revisions

Talk:Volkswagen:Deliveries/Seasonal Analysis (view source)

Revision as of 19:46, 27 January 2023

145 bytes added , 27 January 2023

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Moritz

Bureaucrats, Administrators

2,756

edits

Revision as of 19:43, 27 January 2023 (view source) Moritz (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:46, 27 January 2023 (view source) Moritz (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 59:		Line 59:
	2. Additionally i'd google the name of the analyst + the name of the company and see if first results show a new prediction of the analyst + a strong stock movement on that day. (Because if the analyst changes his price target a lot let's say buy rating of 150€-> buy rating of 250€ that event could cause the stock to jump but on TipRanks it's not clearly visible which prediction changes are the most important ones).		2. Additionally i'd google the name of the analyst + the name of the company and see if first results show a new prediction of the analyst + a strong stock movement on that day. (Because if the analyst changes his price target a lot let's say buy rating of 150€-> buy rating of 250€ that event could cause the stock to jump but on TipRanks it's not clearly visible which prediction changes are the most important ones).

	PS. Eventually after we established a new process we'd want to write a guideline how we are doing it. (But only after the process works well and is clear). I therefore created already the name of the Guideline-> Guideline:Analysts in the Guideline section. In such a Guideline we ~~don't have to explain self explanatory steps~~ should note down good methods we come across e.g. Best way to measure the Market Influence of an Analyst --[[User:PirateCaptain\|PirateCaptain]] ([[User talk:PirateCaptain\|talk]]) 19:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)		PS. Eventually after we established a new process we'd want to write a guideline how we are doing it. (But only after the process works well and is clear). I therefore created already the name of the Guideline-> Guideline:Analysts in the Guideline section. I am not sure if we should describe self explanatory steps in such a Guideline if we can use an example article which is clear enough (what is your opinion?) but importantly we should note down everything that is not obvious like good methods we come across e.g. Best way to measure the Market Influence of an Analyst --[[User:PirateCaptain\|PirateCaptain]] ([[User talk:PirateCaptain\|talk]]) 19:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)